KHOODEELAAR! Action replay: We look again at the CRASS role-playing 'Select Committees' of MPs and 'Peers' - here, later today

KHOODEELAAR! action archive: dissecting dissemblers who peddled and are peddling London CRASSrail

Dissecting the claims of Ken Livingstone's ex-adviser and reviewing George Galloway's media

Editor in Chief © MUHAMMAD HAQUE.
These pages are regularly updated and the contents moved from here and archived after short displays.
The 6th Edition 2220 Hrs GMT / 2320 Hrs UK time Sunday 7 May 2006 LEGAL NOTICE
The materials published here are originally authored items that are only published for education and information purposes only. None of the materials is intended for any commercial, party political, unethical, immoral purposes or uses or applications disseminations or citations whatever.None of the material must be referred to without the full legal and moral parameters being recognised and that recognition must be reasonably and accurately identical to one that is hereby and herewith stated and implied.All legal and authoring rights belong to the rights-holders who are identified with each appropriate itemsPermission must be sought before any material is used in anyway that the law and morality warrant should be done only by seeking the authors’ and the rights holder’s prior written permission.Where no by-line is included the IPRs and other rights are asserted by the Editor in chief and by the publishing organisation the AADHIKAR Foundation.These pages are regularly updated and the contents moved from here and archived after short displays. The Oldest files posted here will be deleted or moved off this site or pages first.Visitors and viewers are advised to bear this fact in mind.To access the AADHIKAR library and archives, please send your name and postal address and specify the date and subject [starting from 19 December 1980 to the present date] CLICK HERE to send an email request or to send an email directly from your own e-mail sender to aadhikarlibrary@yahoo.co.ukTo send a general e-mail to AADHIKARonline, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail addressaadhikaronline@yahho.co.uk
CLICK to view KHOODEELAAR! No to a Crossrail station at Whitechapel
CLICK HERE to view the KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole updater file on the ouster from Tower Hamlets Council of the CrossRail-promoting Michael Keith at the elections held on 4 May 2006
Mr Kumar Murshid! He has been presented by the East London Idiotiser as if he had been a mountain climber.or something so innocent as a champion of some very moral causeMr Murshid has not been championing ANY moral causeHis has been a London 'mayoral case'
Had he not been linked with Ken Livingstone, what sort of treatment would he have been given as a former subject of deportation orders because he was an illegal immigrant?Looking at the various smiling poses, with a pretence headgear on him, it would not appear that Mr Murshid has in fact been just allowed to claim ‘victory’ mainly because of the behaviour of the judicial system. At one critical stage, the judge DIRECTED the jury to find Mr Murshid NOT guilty.That is as may be [for the time being] But Mr Murshid is NOT entitled to use that to launch a most false and untruthful bid to Relaunch his very lucrative ethnicity-linked career at the expense of the community in the inner citiesHe says he was a victim of racism by Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy! And his claim is peddled on the web by Lee Jasper’s BLINK websiteSome of the sleaziest, the most corrupt ethnicity-linked ‘papers’ circulating in the Borough of Tower Hamlets have been peddling Mr Murshid’s lines for the past three yearsWho is Mr Murshid kidding? Who are they kidding? And why do they even assume that they can get away with this peddling of this utter lie? Tower Hamlets Council is indeed a racist Council. It has been one. For years. But it has remained a racist and a corrupt Council WITH THE PARTICIPATION of Mr Murshid himself.Mr Murshid must not abuse the experiences of the actual victims, the people whose names Mr Murshid does not know, -- people whom Mr Murshid ha used the sufferings and the images of but has never ever known and never ever been one of - in this borough ANY MOREHe is a businessman, now he is parading himself as an ex bankerHe is so many things at once that he reminds us almost of the multi-faced careers-rich [mixed riches!] Michael Keith - that are all linked with multiple careers, multiple ‘geniuses’Will he BRING OUT EVIDENCE to justify any of his claims now - and show to independent verification what exactly he has been doing in Tower Hamlets for the past 23 years? And other questions…
An AADHIKARonline first report on London mayor Ken Livingstone’s ‘ex-adviser-cum-soon-to-be-adviser-again’ Kumar Murshid’s claim that he was a ‘victim of racism’ by the Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy- a special series due to start here on Monday 8 May 2006
George Galloway must not run scared of facing upto the truth on poverty of politics in BritainREVIEW OF THE BRITISH PRESS on Sunday 7 May 2006 .By Muhammad Haque
The British press coverage on Sunday 7 May 2006 of the Blair sleaze and corruption has been as brash-looking as it is on a Sunday on any topic that the press proprietors decide to push in front of their punters.
The point is – does it make any difference? Does the press coverage raise the standard in public life? Will the almost obscene obsession with Blair sleaze end with an era of moral emancipation from the gutters of opportunism and corruption that Blair has come to place this society in? I am writing this after studying the relevant contents of the broadcast by George Galloway on a London commercial radio station, ‘talk sport’ which ended at 2100 hrs GMT Sunday 7 May 2006. I did the checking because Galloway has been being referred to as the ‘voice’ from Britain of all things that are supposedly anti-Tony Blair and his regime. At least that has been the evidence as far as it can be assessed as confirmed by the three main Western-controlled internet search engines and systems – Google, Yahoo and MSN. I am not able to say that I found any concrete ideological or democratic tools that Galloway offered to licensers to his programme. It was clear that George Galloway did not offer much comfort to a caller to his semi-phone-in slot [that runs from 1900 hrs GMT to 2100 hrs GMT on Saturdays and Sundays] , called Carol, who identified herself as calling from Galloway’s own parliamentary constituency of Bethnal Green and Bow. And that caller sounded very much like a RESPECT candidate at the just concluded elections to the Tower Hamlets Council [which includes Bethnal Green and Bow in London’s East End]. The point of this reference is that the caller had a number of clues which Galloway could have used to make a comment on the widely reported political immorality band corruption in the Blaired sections in the Borough of Tower Hamlets The caller Carol even identified Galloway’s Blairist pro-war holder of the seat as MP until 5 May 2005 and made comments about the role that Oona King was playing in allegedly dubious and anti-democratic deals and schemes in the locality of Bow Oona King was referred to several times by the caller Carol but George Galloway was noticeably reluctant to comment on that. He was also noticeably reluctant to comment on the other widely known immoral and sleazy antics that Carole referred to. George Galloway moved on to another caller from almost the same area and had to say a few words to clear up his confusion of the two callers. As one stage during George Galloway’s programme [Sunday 7 May 2006] he was speaking about the financial benefits or salary of MPs. He did not denounce the Blair regime’s incessant raising of MPs salary – as opposed to the conditions and the incomes of the deprived peoples across the inner cities, including Tower Hamlets. It was doubly noticeable because when he appeared before TV cameras on Friday 5 May 2006 at a spot near the UK Houses of Parliament in London to make statements about his RESPECT party’s ‘electoral successes’ in Tower Hamlets and Newham, George Galloway made a specific reference to the Borough of Tower Hamlets being one of the most deprived. He was suggesting in that statement that the fact of his RESPECT party’s getting the number of council seats [12] in that Borough had some correlative link with the electorate’s being located in a more deprioved area in the UK. If that was a suggestion that George Galloway wished to be taken seriously then he ought to have spoken about that on his radio programme in response to some of the points that the caller Carol was making. But he chose [or was he 'edited'!?] to move on to someone else and leave Carol speechless! George Galloway also made a remark on his radio programme to the effect that he would not agree with people calling for a cut in MPs salaries. This remark was very odd. Because if he does not agree with the calls from the public for cutis in Mps salaries then how does he expect any comments he makes about Tower Hamlets being one of the most deprived boroughs to be taken as meaning that he is personifying or typifying any different political representation? The same question could eb asked of all the British press today. They are performing a routine [a going through the motion] of denouncing Tony Blair’s corruption and sleaze. They are not disowning that ideology, that philosophy. Is George Galloway any different? Muhammad Haque’s Review of the British Press will be titled as REVIEW of the British Media on the aadhikaronline from Monday 8 May 2006
To be featured on AADHIKARonline, focussing on the dismemberment of the Blair myth - and the realignment , so far as it goes, of people across the inner cities to defend the communities against the attacks of anti-democratic, Big Business interests- starting at 2100 Hrs GMT Sunday 7 May 2006
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006
How the community will make Tower Hamlets Councillors behave this time!
The first of an exclusive aadhikaronline series exposing the corruption of the community by Tower Hamlets Council during 1994-2006
How the local MP George Galloway must really think about what made the difference at the polling stations in Tower Hamlets on 4 May 2006 – would he have been able to boast, as he inaccurately did on his ‘radio’ show on Saturday 6 May 2006 without there being the community revulsion against the corrupt clique in control of Tower Hamlets Council during the previous years?
Profiles of the rejected David Edgar, Judith Gardiner, Michael Keith – what are the lessons that Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ must learn from those who fell? And how, exactly, did Abbas Uddin Helal ‘survive’? And why he must NEVER be allowed anywhere near the office of the Council leader on Tower Hamlets
AND How many voting deals were there in Brick Lane? And in Weavers! And in the rest of the Borough of Tower Hamlets? And how is it ‘okay’ for Oona King to abuse the Labour Party in Tower Hamlets? Who suffocated the Labour Party in Tower Hamlets? Does anyone remember the Labour Party in Tower Hamlets? Are all the Labour Party activists ‘ex-members’ now?
And the usual features including, definitely, the first aadhikaronline daily REVIEW of the British Press, due to appear here at 2000 Hrs GMT Sunday 7 May 2006
From the last, the 10th Edition published at 2220 Hrs GMT / 2320 Hrs UK time Saturday 6 May 2006
The Khoodeelaar! Demonstration against Crossrail-hole Tower Hamlets Council is at 1700 Hrs on Tuesday 9 May 2006
The Khoodeelaar! Demonstration is Outside the Tower Hamlets Town Hall, Mulberry Place London E14 2BG
This is a camapgn against the CrossRail hole Bill attack on the Brick Lane London E1 area. The attacks will occur if the CrossRail Bill is passed into the CrossRail Act. That Bill needs to be changed fundamentally. The CrossRail Bill is in the UK parliament now. It is currently supposedly being scrutinised by a select committee. If the hole is not stopped then the community in the Brick Lane London E1 area will suffer serious dislocation, disruption and losses. As a result of the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole camapgn, the Tony Blair regime did admit some of the CrossRail hole Bill was unacceptable and announced that it was going to scrap one hole plan. But it still insists on digging another hole in the same area, somewhere in the Brick Lane London E1 area. We are holding the local tower Hamlets Council responsible for that hole provision We are also going to camapgn against CrossRail station at Whitechapel. We are demanding that the public transport needs should be managed on sound economic bases, not on the terms of Big Business and the building and construction conglomerates. We do not need a CrossRail station at Whitechapel. These updated demands are included in the demonstration calls on Tuesday 9 May 2006 The Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Tower Hamlets Council is at 1700 Hrs outside the Tower Hamlets Town Hall, Mulberry Place London E14 2BG Further details together with demonstration demands and updates will be viewable on This KHOODEELAAR WEB SITE on Sunday 7 May 2006
RETURN to the index page of the khoodeelaar! web site CLICK HERE to send e-mail to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane London E1 area camapgnFrom the previous, the 6th edition 6 May 2006
Khoodeelaar! No to Christine Gilbert! – Details of the demand for her removal from Tower Hamlets Council will appear in a Khoodeelaar camapgn report here at 2300 Hrs GMT on Sunday 7 May 2006
Who conned George Galloway in the East End of London and prevented a RESPECT ‘taking back’ of ‘our town hall’ on 4 May 2006? An aadhikaronline report here on Sunday 7 May 2006
Why the East London Idiotiser is a serious threat to the democratic health of the people in the East End of London: did the Idiotiser have any right to lie about the Khoodeelaar! campaign against CrossRail hole?
By Muhammad Haque, Organiser, Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole-Council, No to Crossrail-hole mayor Ken Livingstone, No to CrossRail-hole Transport Secretary Alistair DarlingTo understand the evidence of the perniciously falsifying role being played by the East London Idiotiser in its ‘news’ coverage on the campaign against CrossRail hole, it is important to understand the relevant events that are only very marginally and typically misleadingly included in the ‘reports’ in the ‘East London Idiotiser’[‘The East London Advertiser’].For me at the moment, there is no more appropriate subject than the subject of the Khoodeelaar! Camapgn and how it has been three years of non-stop battle to get the East London Idiotiser to reflect the truth of what is actually going on in the community in the context of the KHOODEELAAR! Camapgn of NO Crossrail hole in Brick Lane E1 area.When I heard from a Khoodeelaar! campaign supporter that the UK Conservative Party ‘leader’ was due to make a stunt appearance in the Brick Lane Area on Monday 24 April 2006, I was not in the least bit interested.I had been one of the very first, if not THE first, commentator on the internet to deride the Tories’ choice of him at allSo I had no intention of taking any campaigning steps or arranging any Khoodeelaar! Camapgn actions around that piece of information at allFor the fact is that David Cameron is not a holder of public office that I am bothered about.Contrary to the hypes that have been accorded him by default even today [Saturday 6 May 2006], I remain of the view that this Cameron character is another Blair-type plastic entity which will do serious damage to the cause of democracy and substance unless it is tested to reveal what if any, democratic, ethical and moral integrity and commitment and fibres it has.And on Monday 24 April 2006, I was of this same view about him,He has not got the intellectual depth let alone the moral character that will be of any real significance to the defence of the Brick Lane London E1 area against the attacks by CrossRail.So how was it that I was in Brick Lane and in fact recorded a conversation with the Conservatives’ ‘Chairman’ Francis Maude?When I found out that the information was inaccurate in one respect and that the person who was due to stage the stunt appearance in Brick Lane on behalf of the UK Tories HQ was in fact Francis Maude, I decided to see what he had to say.For the evidence is that Maude is someone who does have an intellectual profile, not that I would vote for him in an election. But he does.And in so far as the record of the post-Thatcher conservative Party goes, Francis Maude has been arduous in his own bid to hang on to the front page or in the Tory limelight.So for the purpose of collective hard evidence about what exactly the Conservative HQ was 'thinking' about the issue of the CrossRail hole attack on the Brick Lane London E1 area I decided to test him out.The second motivator was that the ‘local Conservatives the ‘Tower Hamlets Conservatives’ were absent from the electoral campaign scene as far as any remarkable opposition to the Crossrail hole was concerned.yet there was this stunt being staged in the actual Brick Lane itself allegedly to mark some sort of publicity recognition on the part of the Conservative Party implying that they did know that a place called Brick Lane existedIt was plain stunt for the publicity around the 4 May council elections at which the Tories were fielding candidates.That the result of the elections in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets [where the CrossRail hole target of the Brick Lane London E1 area is] , confirmed yesterday [5 May 2006] shows that ALL the Tory 'wins' took place at the other end of the Borough from where Brick Lane is, is significant and it adds doubly to the significance on 24 April 2006 of my decision to test Francis Maude out if I was able to do so without getting inside the venue of their 'event'.There is a limit to what I would do even to defend the Brick Lane London E1 area against the CrossRail assault.So when approached by a number of Khoodeelaar! Supporters who saw me in the vicinity, I agreed to hear from them what they said they would witness inside during the visiting Tory Chairman’s stuntAnd so I spent the necessary time before I got a moment which I spent in asking the questions that I did ask. [to view that transcript of my Questions and Francis Maude’s answers, visit http://www.khoodeelaar.com] As I asked those questions, I noticed that the photographer and the reporter whom I had noticed for the previous at least two hours [there for the ‘East London Idiotiser’], were also still present.I did see them hanging around for a few minutes after Francis Maude had left Brick LaneIn fact, as I was leaving Brick Lane, I saw the East London Idiotiser’s reporter again and he was saying goodbye to me when I gave him the facts of how his paper had published a pack of Crossrail-hole-Michael Keith-plugging lies on the occasion of the Ken Livingstone stunt [24 March 2006]. The East London Idiotiser reporter did not want to hear the details.Here are the details in very concise form: That on the day of the Ken Livingstone stunt , the East London Idiotiser published a very inaccurate and a very stupid plug for the CrossRail-hole peddling ‘leader’ of Tower Hamlets Council, Michael Keith.The Idiotiser web site lied in describing Michael Keith as ‘campaigner’’. It was like calling a criminal the prosecutor in his own case!Khoodeelaar! immediately sent messages demanding that the Idiotiser’s editor and publish demands for their publish the corrections and that they apologies to the local community for the outrageous lie they had perpetrated for saving the pathetic councillor career of the CrossRail-hole-Keith.In the print edition of the East London Idiotiser that appeared on Thursday 30 March 2006, the Idiotiser repeated the very lies that had appeared on their website on 24 March 2006 .As if that were not bad enough, the Idiotiser printed a gallery or a parade of fiddlers who had nothing whatever to do with opposing the CrossRail hole attack on the Brick Lane London E1 area at all.But the Idiotiser gave them credit for having done so.I shall pinpoint why it matters who the ‘reports’ identify as being opposed to the hole and who they suppress>It makes the difference of day and night.In so far as the ‘record’ is concernedOne such fiddler wrongly and perniciously promoted by the East London Idiotiser was a man that the Idiotiser had not even spoken to about the Campaign against the CrossRail hole assault on the Brick Lane London E1 area!That particular fiddler was only eager to see his face in the paper and he did that by handing to the Idiotiser's visiting ‘reporter’ a picture of himself that the East London Idiotiser r printed.The main [alleged] caption next his printed picture was in implied reference to the alleged conversation the East London Idiotiser reporter [Jules Hunter] had with an altogether different person.That person was indeed present at the scene of the conversation but he had not said what the East London Idiotiser invented in its report.[To be continued]
AADHIKARonline – Updating the introduction to Qazi Nazrul Islam – the ‘national poet’ of Bangladesh and more – with a revised translation of his poem - The girl and the wood cat [First published by Muhammad Haque in 1984]
Who forgot May Day in the East End in 2006?
And why it is time to learn about that very awkward bishop in exile who was hounded out of Namibia…. [Coming here shortly] [Items that appeared here have now been archived] [To obtain archived items or to get access to them, please send your specific request by e-mail to aadhikarlibrary@yahoo.co.uk]
Review of the British press –We publish an aadhikaronline analysis of the UK press and media of Saturday 6 May 2006 here at [this schedule has been changed] 2200 Hrs GMT [6 May 2006] – Also in this section, we ask, ‘Why must the people of the East End of London put up with such shoddy standard [!] on the ‘local’ paper the East London Idiotiser!
[Continuing the AADHIKARonline analysis of the role of the ‘local paper’ the East London Advertiser’ which is called the ‘East London Idiotiser’ because of its idiotising role in the main in its coverage of the political news in the 'circulation area' - the area corresponding mainly to the present geographical area of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets events] The previous part of this series is accessible on this site [see below].
Review of the British legal system – The Prejudice of the Judiciary – this title is in fact based on the title of the series on the role played by the Judges in the British legal system as initiated and authored by John Griffith, formerly professor of public law at the London School of Economics and a leading communicator on the British judiciary ‘Politics of the Judiciary’. This AADHIKARonline feature is indented to fill the many gaps Griffith left behind and to demolish some unnecessary structure that Griffith did not object to. We shall be starting the review by reviewing Clive Anderson and his programme on BBC Radio Four. Anderson is as morally inept as must be the commissioning editors in the BBC who keep giving him licence payers money after he is exposed as empty and bankrupt in the last slot that they had given him… in this way... How the legal system in Britain in 2006 is as repressive as it was before any ‘legal system' to speak of was identifiable in the UK? And who is bearing the brunt of the illegalities of the law? These and similar questions will be asked here on a regular basis starting at 1800 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 9 May 2006
AADHIKARonline Literature focussing on the politics of ‘the arts’ – In this section, we shall look at some of the flagship British TV and radio slots that are associated with the popular access to what constitutes arts and how the British media perpetuates the political agenda around the arts – We start by discussing the role of Melvyn Bragg and the multiple careers he has been given to carry in his bag of braggages. Scheduled to appear here at 1000 hrs GMT on Monday 8 May 2006
From the previous edition published as the 8th Edition 2000 Hrs GMT / 2100Hrs UK time Friday 5 May 2006
What is the East London Idiotiser going to say now about the corrupt clique that they frenetically plugged away for and quite wrongly dishonestly, untruthfully credited [!] for bringing the CrossRail hole problem to the East End of London?And how is their commercial stablemate the ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’ going to ‘celebrate’ the Lib Dems’ sinking as the ‘main Opposition’ Party on the Tower Hamlets Council? And the vanishing of Janet Ludlow?
By Muhammad Haque, Organiser, Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
2000 Hrs GMT Friday 5 May 2006The role of the East London Idiotiser in promoting the crossrail hole attacks plan on the East End of London is now due for ted detailed examination that the Khoodeelaar! Organisation had promised before the ‘elections’ held on 4 May 2006Just before the idiotising regime of Richard Tidiman was abruptly ended, he carried one of those mentally lazy and half-conscious pieces that no knowledgeable, competent et6hical commentator or ‘reporter’ of any dignity should allow to be published in their medium or outletthe significance of that lazy Idiotiser piece plugging for Crassrail was in the fact that only a year before then, the same publication had splashed on the Khoodeelaar! Camapgn demonstration [held on Friday 22 October 2004] [This date was printed in error as 22 October 2006 in the previous edition of this page of the aadhikaronline] against the then ‘leader’ of tower hamlets council, helal abbas. the East London Idiotiser’s splash on the khoodeelaar! Organisation’s demonstration did not, include the word khoodeelaar!. And it did not mention the name of the main speaker, either.Yet for the entirely of that demonstration, the khoodeelaar organiser maintained in a very detailed, factual narrative that was published in that speech for the first time.although given in, the speech contained facts, statistics, analyses of the environmental, legal, social, economic consigns of the crossrail, hole plan, stuff that no local or national [let alone parliamentary - in the sense of being either stated or initiated or originated in or by anyone in the UK Houses of Parliament, on the subject of the crossrail hole Bill] speaker or commentator had made before on the subject of the crossrail hole attack plan against the brick lane london E1 area.When the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER came to ‘report’ on that demonstration, it failed to mention a single one of those items.It lied in its report by presenting that report as if it had in any way been organised by another party.That lie was in the fact that the superimposed the name and the political image of an impostor outfit instead of plainly acknowledging the plain fact. The fact that their own 'staff' commissioned photographer had recdio4rded for over an hour of non-stop photography.The paper has not cased to be a racist parasitic publication which is prone to perpetuate the poisonous lie that no multi-racial leadership of the community should be seen as normalExcept when it is possible to suggest in a plug piece for an dubiously aligned and promoted alleged adviser to the supreme social corrupter of London, Ken Livingstone.[To be continued]From the previous, 7th, edition Friday 5 May 2006
Why Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail hole plot has been vindicated on how an undemocratic, dishonest set of local councillors cannot be left alone where it comes to the community’s rights
By Muhammad Haque, organiser, Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Bill campaign 1730 GMT London Friday 5 May 2006
Tower Hamlets Council elections held on 4 May 2006, were fraught with fraud, fraudulence and fear.Fraud connected with the administration of the elections by the Borough’s ‘returning officer’ Christine Gilbert who allowed her mismanagement to tolerate or even to engender an atmosphere that was conducive to the mass theft of votes via postal excuses.Fraudulence was allowed to prevail on such a wide scale that a stunningly corrupt plot was hatched in wards like [but not only in] the Brick Lane area [mis-named on the Tower Hamlets Council’s official list of Ward names as ‘Spitalfields and Banglatown’] with the sole object of robbing the electorate of its democratic franchise.This is seen in the composition of the ‘elected’ Tower Hamlets council nowWe have again been lumbered with another corrupt clique that will in all intents and purposes stand in the community’s way and will sabotage the community’s campaign against the CrossRail holeHow id the corrupt elements get back in?The answer is – by corrupt means>Then the question arises:- wasn’t Christine Gilbert supposed to look out as the returning officer to prevent corruption?Had Christine Gilbert not been told that her conduct as the ‘acting’ returning officer at the May 2005 general elections were shamble?So why didn't she not address those concerns expressed in May 2005>Why did she allow the year to pass and for the same , or in some cases even worse,. Shambles to occur around the voters’ most precious token of democratic rights?Christine Gilbert has not answered these questionsShe can’tbecause if she even attempts to answer these questions then the secret agenda which she is in place to advance will be exposed[To be continued]From the previous editions 5 May 2006:
Which ‘leading’ ‘Labour councillor’ acted as the second ‘Brick Lane area mafia boss’ to fix the elections results that have now been ‘declared in their favour’? Khoodeelaar to ask Police to investigate allegations of bribery that has been carried out by the abuses of Tower Hamlets Council cash and facilities
An aadhikaronline investigation-part 1 Filed 1040 GMT Friday 5 May 2006
The ‘results’, whatever the final count, were produced in a significant way, by the sue of bribery carried out at the initiative of a number of [officially-registered as ] Labour Party candidates whop have been declared as re-elected councillors.We understand that a number of those including at least two in the Brick Lane London E1 area, in fact sued bribes, and other council-linked resources to secure the ‘block’ votes which were delivered through the misuse of Council-paid grants to these community groupsThe groups include at least one ‘religious’ body whose ‘management committee’ acted as the agency for the bribery and the corruption of the electoral systemEarly indications on Friday 5 May 2006 from campaigning group Khoodeelaar! have shown that they would refer the allegations to the Police as soon as certain formalities have been completed.
Tower Hamlets Council web site is not workingWho in what ‘community organisations’ were paid how much bribe by sitting councillors to produce the results in Tower Hamlets?
From a previous edition: Friday 5 May 2006 An aadhikaronline report 0910 GMT
Just as the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council got a serious blow with its key cliquester Michael Keith being kicked out of the Shadwell by the voters, so was its propaganda outfit showing signs of treachery.aadhikaronline writers contacted the Council’s ‘web team’ who could not give any acceptable explanation except to confirm the undeniable that their web site was down. They could not say either when the site would be operating again.
Tower Hamlets Council officials delaying publication of full results. The reasons have not been explained either.We shall be reporting on that delay and the associated tactics by what must be the servants of the corrupt clique which has just – AADHIKARonline RESULTS and analysis of the Local Council elections, in Tower Hamlets and elsewhere in London will be published here throughout the day Friday 5 May 2006. We should have been given the results by now by the Christine Gilbert ‘returning officer’ staff but they have been unavailable at the time of publishing this edition. To send a general e-mail to AADHIKARonline, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail address aadhikaronline@yahoo.co.uk . To make a direct communication on a mater of policy addressing the Editor and Publisher, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail address aadhikareditor@yahoo.co.uk
var yviContents='http://themis.geocities.yahoo.com/themis/as.php?cc=uk&s=382106076&l=NE&b=1&t=1147041324';yviR='uk';yfiEA(0);